In these analyses, the OGQ takes an in-depth look at the following topic: Benchmarking and ranking of live football betting offers – Q4 2025. The data research benchmarks live/in-play event availability by counting the number of live events offered at a given time. It ranks leading operators against the quarter’s best-practice benchmark and highlights the spread between leaders and laggards. The focus is on how deep and consistent live menus look across operators, especially for football/soccer.
Overall benchmarking and ranking of live/in-play all sports betting offers – Q4/2025
This chart ranks operators by the volume of live/in-play events across all sports, with the top brand set as the 100-point benchmark. It shows a clear leader and a noticeable gap between the strongest offers and the trailing group.
Top performers stand out immediately, with William Hill setting the pace and Marathonbet and 10bet following behind. This suggests consistently broad live coverage across sports.
The average provides a useful reality check, sitting well below the leading score. It shows that “typical” live depth still trails best practice by a meaningful margin.
At the bottom end, Coral takes the last rank, signalling a comparatively thin all-sports live menu in this snapshot. Several others also sit well below the average, widening the spread.
Overall benchmarking and ranking of live/in-play football betting offers – Q4/2025
This chart applies the same ranking approach to football/soccer live events, again using the top operator as the 100-point reference. It highlights which brands build the deepest football live menus versus those that offer a narrower selection.
Top performers are led by William Hill again, with 10bet and Marathonbet close behind. The upper tier looks built for volume and frequent live football choice.
The average sits noticeably under the leading score, underlining how far the “standard” football live menu is from the best-in-class benchmark. That gap matters most during busy match windows.
The lowest rank goes to Stake.com, marking a sharp drop-off from the rest of the field. Even operators just above the bottom still trail the leaders by a wide distance.
Please find more data and the methodology applied in the current edition of the OGQ Magazine. Also, find more content in our data section.

