The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and the Gambling Commission (GC) are collaborating to evaluate the implementation of the Gambling Act Review (GAR). This evaluation is critical to assess the effectiveness of policy changes introduced in response to technological advancements and changing gambling practices. The evaluation aims to balance consumer freedoms with safeguarding vulnerable groups and communities.

• Focus of the evaluation: The plan emphasizes specific policy measures to assess their impacts and outcomes. A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to capture intended and unintended effects. The evaluation also aims to account for the combined influence of multiple policy measures.
• Evaluation timeline and scope: Activities started with scoping in January 2024, while fieldwork begins in January 2025. The review extends into 2026, influenced by evolving policy decisions and changes in government. This flexible approach ensures that live policy adjustments are incorporated effectively.
• Methodological framework: The evaluation adopts a theory-based design, combining Contribution Analysis and Process Tracing. These methods will clarify causal relationships and validate findings through triangulated evidence. Data will be collected via longitudinal surveys, quasi-experimental designs, interviews, and diary studies.
• Key stakeholders and participants: Input will come from operators, consumers, and support providers to reflect a broad spectrum of perspectives. Engagement with stakeholders ensures the findings are representative and address real-world implications. Additionally, a Lived Experience Panel will provide insights from individuals directly affected by gambling policies.
• Data synthesis and reporting: The evaluation will integrate process and outcome data to explain observed changes and their underlying causes. This includes examining enabling factors, risks, and unintended consequences. Insights will inform future gambling policy design and implementation strategies.
• Ethical considerations: A robust ethical review process will address potential vulnerabilities among participants. Oversight by an Evaluation Advisory Group ensures objectivity and adherence to research best practices. These measures uphold ethical standards and promote trust in the evaluation’s findings.

The final report in 2026 will present evidence-based conclusions to guide ongoing and future gambling-related policy changes.